posted 17 hours agoOct 20, 2014, 1:17 am with 11 notes

demonicdarling:

demonicdarling:

Got a haircut now I look like a real 20 year old

Bein slept on man this is a national crisis

posted 17 hours agoOct 20, 2014, 1:13 am with 1,402 notes
me n my libertarian gf

seriousjones:

[holdin hands]

me: bb ur hands r so invisible

her: that me free market

posted 20 hours agoOct 19, 2014, 9:49 pm with 1,834 notes

mrfrond:

Same thing!

posted 20 hours agoOct 19, 2014, 9:46 pm with 2,590 notes

lucifercub:

Hanging out with my Beautiful boyfriend.

posted 21 hours agoOct 19, 2014, 9:40 pm with 60,875 notes

professorsparklepants:

gethinblake:

so many of my friends are queer that i genuinely forget that the majority of the population isn’t on a regular basis

image

posted 22 hours agoOct 19, 2014, 8:17 pm with 53 notes

ask-jaggi-pack:

Desire Sensor, you got some ‘splaining to do!

Why the fuck can I get THREE Wyvern Stones from one Sand Barioth but not a single Indigo Tusks+?  And then another Wyvern Stone in the next hunt, but no Indigo Tusks+!

image

posted 3 days agoOct 17, 2014, 1:20 am with 915 notes
posted 3 days agoOct 16, 2014, 10:26 pm with 329,804 notes

2spookywendigo:

jabbaduhutt:

russian-tupperware:

aetropos:

yeahyeahno:

chicksdigthephoenix:

super-scout:

aetropos:

starexorcist:

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

image

image

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

image

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

image

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

image

image

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

image

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

image

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo?

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

image

Thank you for your time.

image

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

image

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

image

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

image

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

image

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

image

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

image

image

image

image

Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.

image

image

The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog?

image

On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.

image

Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?

image

image

Rather unlikely!

image

Actually, Mr. Godot!!

image

Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…

image

image

If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!

image

Aah… these M&M’s droplets

image

So colourful… reminds me of the days of my youth!

image

the red ones remind me of my hemorroids… *cough*

image

image

I have found some new evidence though the original image source suggesting this second image has been tampered with!

image

This image clearly shows candies that correspond to the colours commonly found in M & M s…  The edge of the bowl is visible, as are some ‘M’ symbols, if you look closely.

image

This suggests the second image in the original is perhaps just a fabrication based off of the second.

image

Therefore…

It is clearly a fraud!

image

image

You shouldn’t jump the “fraud” gun just yet, Wright. If your source is really the corresponding photo to the first, then the “gumball” picture in question might not be at fault. To put it bluntly, it might just be a copycat.

image

To put it another way, this could just be a case of a mistaken and mismatched photoset..

image

With all the evidence provided, I think it’s safe to assume this case could be solved: The candies in the second photograph are not M&Ms, but the photo itself was not exactly tampered with. It was just a completely separate photo of separate candies, possibly just misplaced in this set by the original poster, who was completely unaware of the mismatch!

image

Hold it right there everyone.

There is..

image

A PUZZLE HIDDEN IN THAT BOWL OF MISLEADING CANDY.

I cannot, not reblog this. It is amazing!

OH. MY. FUCKING. GOD.

(Source: f-ckkkkk)

posted 4 days agoOct 16, 2014, 4:09 pm with 7,325 notes
vocaloid fans: world is mine? haha ew
*world is mine starts to play*
vocaloid fans: sekAAAAAAAAI DE ICHIBAN OHIMESAMA YAAAAAAAS MIKU YAAAAAS
posted 4 days agoOct 16, 2014, 3:10 pm with 57,762 notes
annekewrites:

Wow. This is perfect.

annekewrites:

Wow. This is perfect.

(Source: molotovcomics.com)

posted 4 days agoOct 16, 2014, 3:04 pm with 28,757 notes
posted 4 days agoOct 16, 2014, 2:55 pm with 6,433 notes

(Source: asukashikinamis)

posted 4 days agoOct 16, 2014, 1:26 pm with 278,008 notes

knowledgeandlove:

videohall:

Husky dog performs her overly dramatic death trick.

I’ve wasted fifteen minutes of my life watching this 8 second long video. 

posted 4 days agoOct 16, 2014, 1:23 pm with 1,316 notes
whitehouse:

Here’s what you need to know about Ebola, and what we’re doing to respond.

whitehouse:

Here’s what you need to know about Ebola, and what we’re doing to respond.

posted 4 days agoOct 16, 2014, 1:13 pm with 42,138 notes

freewilllhunting:

the real question is

if you had to choose between world peace and living in the Star Trek universe what colour would your shirt be

(Source: queensamwise)